Welcome!


Welcome to my blog! My name is Lindsay and I am a graduate student studying English as a Second Language at Georgetown College. This site was created to help you meet the academic and social needs of your English Language Learners. Here you will find links to collaboration, testing, planning, and more.

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

The Shutdown and Education

As the government is in the midst of  a shut down, I can't help but wonder how this will effect teachers and the education system. The article below from Politics K:12 helps break it down between a short down shut down and a long term one.

This from Politics K:12:
So it's happened: Congress was unable to reach agreement on temporary spending plan to keep the government open—and the U.S. Department of Education and other government agencies are on partial shutdown. It's the first time this has happened since the Clinton administration, back in 1995 and 1996.
While that means a much quieter day at 400 Maryland Ave, most schools and school districts aren't going to be immediately affected by a short-term shutdown. A longer-term shutdown, however, could cause more headaches. See our preview here of the Education Department's shutdown plan.
Below are the answers to some frequently asked questions about what happens now:
How many people will report to work at the Education Department? A lot fewer than usual. More than 90 percent of the department's employees—about 4,000 people in all—will be furloughed for the first week of the shutdown. U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, of course, still has to come in. If the shutdown goes on for more than a week, more employees could return on a temporary basis, but it would not be more than 6 percent of the department's staff.
This could lead to a frustrating situation for districts and state education agencies that are trying to get quick answers to their questions—furloughed federal employees aren't even supposed to be checking their work email today.
Will there be any delay to formula funds, such as Title I, special education, and career and technical education? For the most part, no. Employees will be on hand to ensure that roughly $22 billion in formula funds to states and districts makes it out the door, as scheduled, in October.
What about competitive-grant programs? Race to the Top, Investing and Innovation, and Promise Neighborhoods still have fiscal year 2013 money left that needs to be allocated by Dec. 31. Department employees may return to finish that job. (Fiscal year 2013 technically ended on Sept. 30.)
What about student loans and college aid? Pell grants and federal student loans would largely be unaffected by the shutdown. Campus-based aid programs, such as Work Study, wouldn't be so lucky.
Impact Aid always seems to be a special case in these federal budget situations. Is that the deal this time? Sort of. Districts that receive federal Impact Aid dollars usually don't get their money until late October, even in a typical, functional budget year, according to John Forkenbrock, the executive director of the National Association of Federally Impacted Schools. (Impact Aid goes out to some 1,200 districts that lose out on tax revenue, thanks to a federal presence, such as a Native American reservation or a military base nearby.)
If the shutdown goes on for a long time though—or if Congress passes a series of very short-term extension measures keeping the government open for just a week or two while lawmakers hammer out their differences, things could get messy for Impact Aid districts. Last year, for example, some had to ask for an advanced payment on some of their funding, in part because there were so many short-term spending bills.
But so far, the districts aren't in full-on alarm mode. "I haven't had anybody call yet in a panic state," Forkenbrock said.
What about money from other agencies? School lunch? E-rate? Head Start? Funding for most child nutrition programs, including school lunch and school breakfast programs, which are run  by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, will continue through October. More in the USDA's shutdown plan.
Head Start, which is administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is trickier. There are some 1,600 grantees but just 23 would have their grants affected by a short-term shutdown, according to an HHS spokesman. Overall, those centers serve nearly 19,000 children.
So are all of those children stuck at home today? Not necessarily, the spokesman said. Some programs' budgets might be able to accommodate a temporary delay in funding; others may fill in with reserve funds. More in the HHS shutdown plan.
As for the E-rate, the funds will continue to flow during the shutdown. The Universal Service Administrative Company, which administers the program, is essentially separate from the federal government, so it will be business as usual. The only caveat? If USAC needs guidance from the Federal Communications Commission, which oversees E-Rate, it will have to wait until after the shutdown.
Overall, that doesn't sound so bad. A short-term shutdown really isn't so bad, for most districts. In fact, if the shutdown doesn't last very long, most may not notice a huge difference, said Noelle Ellerson, the associate executive director for policy and advocacy at the American Association of School Administrators.
"With a short term shutdown, the impact won't be any more discernible to school districts than the current dysfunction attributable to sequestration and the lack of ESEA reauthorization," she said.
A longer-term shutdown is a different animal. "A protracted delay in Department obligations and payments beyond one week would severly curtail the cash flow to school districts, colleges and universities, and vocational rehabilitation agencies that depend on the Department to support their services," department officials wrote in their shutdown plan.
What happens down the road? This might not be the last fiscal showdown, by a long shot. In fact, we've got another deadline coming up soon—Congress must raise the debt ceiling, likely in mid-October. If lawmakers can't make that happen, there could be major implications for school districts, states—and the overall economy. That could be much worse than the shutdown. More on this here.
That doesn't sound good at all. Why is this happening? It has nothing to do with schools, really. Instead, it's all about whether there should be a temporary delay (or defunding) of the president's landmark Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare. Everything you ever wanted to know about how we got to this point in the budget crisis and where we're going here.
Advocates are watching the situation closely—and are hoping for some certainty soon. "As educators work to ensure that every student has the best possible chance to succeed, instability in federal funding - including the sequester, the shutdown, and possible issues around the debt ceiling - threatens our ability to deliver a world-class education," said Carissa Miller, the deputy executive director of the Council of Chief State School Officers.
So what has it been like to be working at a government agency in the midst of all this? Sort of strange, employees say. It's made the end of the federal fiscal year, usually a busy time, even more hectic.
"Employees have worked extremely hard to make sure that all grants and contracts are awarded and other matters completed under the pressure of the ending of the fiscal year," said Cameron French, a spokesman for the Education Department. "We continue to make sure that our students, teachers, and schools are supported, while facing the possibility of challenging circumstances."
What does Duncan have to say about all this? He's not too happy with Congress, as you can imagine. "Right now our country faces stark choices: We can continue to play politics with the budget and the debt ceiling, or we can fund a federal government that Americans count on," the education secretary said in a speech Monday at the National Press Club.

ELL students with Special Needs

I recently came across this article from a colleague's blog. This article is wonderful for ELL students with special needs. It provides teachers with tips and resources for meeting your students' needs.
http://computer.howstuffworks.com/internet/basics/how-to-podcast.htm

reblogged from MazzocchiESL

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Involving Parents as Cultural Mediators

Parents can act as cultural mediators in several ways. Teachers who are willing to reach out to parents often are rewarded with a greater understanding of their students' potential.
These ways can include:
  • Establish an explicit open- door policy so parents feel welcome
  • Send written information home in regards to classroom updates and assignments. Encourage parents for feedback
  • Call parents or have conferences to discuss student progress- don't forget to mention when things are going well and the child's achievements. Let the parents know you are available for them.
  • Suggest specific ways parents can help with assignments
  • Get to know and understand the community. This can be done by visiting, and letting the parents know you are available for home visits if necessary
  • Solicit parents' views on education through a simple questionnaire or interview.




Adapted from Banks (2004)

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Comprehensibility

Comprehensibility means the understanding of what is being taught or discussed. According to SDAIE (Specially Designed Academic Instruction in English)makes it different from mainstream instruction. Comprehensibility can be increased in four different ways:
1. Contextualization: This means "the verbal presentation of a lesson is supplemented by the use of manipulatives, realia, media, and visual backup as teachers write key words and concepts on the board; the use of graphs, pictures, maps, and other physical proper to communicate, or by technology" (Diaz- Rico & Weed, 2010). This appeals to different learning styles of students.
2. Modeling: This aspect includes using hands- on, explanations where students are able to follow step by step to understand new concepts.
3. Speech Adjustment: One way to adjust your speech is to monitor personal language usage and reduce teacher talking in the classroom. This allows for the students to have more opportunities to accommodate their students' evolving proficiency.
4. Comprehension Checks: Teachers should take into consideration a linguistic hierarchy of question types. This includes nonverbal responses during a silent period, yes/ no or multiple choice responses in the beginning, and once more comfortable ask open ended questions.

Learning Language Structure

One aspect that is important to remember in regards to language learners in the nonverbal communication aspect. "This nonverbal system involves sending and receiving messages through gesture, facial expression, eye contact, posture, and tone of voice" (Diaz- Rico & Weed, 2010). Think about how hard it would be to learn a completely new verbal language. Then, throw in nonverbal communication. There is no written code or rules in regards to this. Mainstream teachers need to remember that body language can actually impede communication due to cultural differences. Gestures are another controversial nonverbal sign of communication. Gestures are used throughout different countries, however have many different meanings than what we are used to. As teachers, we need to become culturally sensitive and aware of these differences.

Sociocultural Support for L1 in the Classroom Environment

Different sociocultural factors provide positive results in education for ELL students. One aspect is in the form of cooperative learning. "Positive race relations among students and socialization toward pro-social values and behaviors are potential outcomes of a cooperative- learning environment" (Diaz- Rico & Weed, 2010). As a result, there may be a sense of comfort in the school environment with students from different cultures. "Students may gain psychological support from one another as they acquire English, and this support can help the students work as a group with the teacher to achieve a workable sociocultural compromise between the use of L1 and L2" (Diaz- Rice & Weed, 2010).

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Title III District Procedures

This week, I went to research how my district published and trained personnel in regards to Title III. To my surprise, there wasn't much posted on the district website except for the legal definition. However, I searched on BroadyESL and was able to find a wonderful article that helped explain the best practices used based on federal and state regulations.
http://broadyesl.wordpress.com/2012/09/25/title-iii-limited-english-proficient-lep-immigrant-students-district-procedures-nclb-requirements/

Monday, September 23, 2013

Integrating Language Skills

When discussing the four domains, I often feel that they are discussed separately. However, this should not be the case with instruction. According to Diaz- Rico & Weed, writing, reading, listening, and speaking should be combined. This will help develop the language skills in a unified way. It also helps reinforce one skill by using another. This allows for "language to convert from receptive (listening and reading) to productive (speaking and writing) and vice versa" (Diaz- Rice & Weed, 2010).

Sunday, September 22, 2013

Krashen’s Monitor Model

Krashen's Monitor Model believed that people acquire second- language structures in a predictable order. However, this was only the case if they obtained comprehensible input, "and if their anxiety is low enough to allow input" (Diaz- Rico & Weed, 2010). This theory includes five hypothesis:
- The Acquisition- Learning Hypothesis: acquisition and learning are two separate processes in mastering a second language.
- The Natural Order Hypothesis: Krashen believed there is a natural order of acquisition of English morphemes.
- The Monitor Hypothesis: This is an error detecting mechanism. This checks for accuracy and edits.
- The Input Hypothesis: Language is acquired through comprehensible input. This includes using a variety of techniques and modalities. It also includes visual and kinesthetic to make sure speech is understandable.
- The Affective Filter Hypothesis: This address emotional variables. This includes anxiety, motivation, and self- confidence. These emotions can block or facilitate input from reaching the language acquisition device (LAD).

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

YouTube Video Using Web 2.0 Tools for Alternative Assessment of ESL Students

Reblogged from broadyesl:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe1HLs367VQ&feature=player_embedded

TESOL Standards vs. TESOL Technology Standards

It is sometimes confusing to distinguish between TESOL standards and TESOL Technology Standards. Below, I typed up a short description using both books that hopefully will hope clarify between the two.

TESOL Technology Standards: The TESOL technology standards provide standards that are based on technology integration. These standards help provide a better understanding and how they can be applied in different contexts. The TESOL technology standards are very helpful because it provides assistance with available technology. This can include little technology or a greater amount. The resources provide technology alternatives since technology plays an important role in ELL academic success. There are three goals TESOL provides. 1. Language learners demonstrate foundational knowledge and skills in technology for a multilingual world. 2. Language learners use technology in socially and culturally appropriate, legal, and ethical ways. 3. Language learners effectively use and critically evaluate technology- based tools as aids in the development of their language learning competence as part of formal instruction and for further learning. 

TESOL Proficiency Standards: The TESOL Standards consist of five different standards for ELL students. The first standard is based on a need for social, intercultural, and instructional purposes. The other standards focus on academic areas that include math, science, language arts, and social students. . TESOL standards are joined with lesson plans to make sure all parts of the lesson reach certain objectives. TESOL has a focus on language proficiency in schools. These standards reflect academic language proficiency that is connected to content standards for ELL students based on English proficiency.

TESOL Technology and the classroom

This article helped discus the importance of implementing TESOL technology standards into the classroom. It isn't long, however is worth reading.

http://newsmanager.commpartners.com/tesoleeis/issues/2012-11-13/3.html

Sunday, September 8, 2013

ELLs and Running Records: Miscue Analysis

I recently came across an article on BroadyESL in regards to Running Records and ELL students. As a first grade reading teacher, running records are completed on a weekly basis, and I am constantly looking for ways to better my approaches with ELL students. WIDA created a list of "tips" that should be taken into consideration. These includes providing sufficient processing time, fully understanding miscues, and even learning more about your student's native language. This article is a must read!
http://widaatwcer.blogspot.com/2013/03/running-records-and-ells-miscue-analysis.html

Friday, August 23, 2013

Indian Culture

Below you will find a video regarding Indian culture. You will also find tips for teachers on how to create a culturally responsive school and how to help parents become more involved.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBUJtT1y-NA

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Chinese Wedding Traditions

One thing I find very interesting is the concept of wedding traditions around the world. Today, I researched wedding traditions in China. This site contains both past and present wedding traditions in the Chinese culture. One thing I thought was interesting was when planning the wedding date. "Auspicious days are subject to interpretation by fortune tellers that perform the analysis based on one’s birth date (day and hour) after consultation with the Chinese almanac." I know when my husband and I got married, we looked for open dates for the venue and the pastor. I also thought it was neat how history and ancient traditions are important. I especially like when the importance of letters are discussed.
"Request Letter: This letter confirms the formal arrangement of a marriage.  It is sent by the groom's family to the bride's family.  This letter is normally presented with the initial gifts for the bride's family.
Gift Letter This letter accompanies the formal gifts for the Bride's family.  It is actually a gift list that records the description and quantity of the gifts.
Wedding Letter This letter is presented to the bride's family on th day of the wedding.  It confirms the act of bringing the bride into the groom's family."
http://www.chinese-poems.com/wedcus.html

Teaching Tip: Teaching Comprehension Strategies for ELLs

Comprehension can be somewhat difficult for ELL's. Consider these tips when teaching comprehension
  • Introduce the comprehension strategy (this can include sequencing, making inferences, comparing/contrasting, relating background knowledge, distinguishing between fact and opinion, finding the main idea and details, problem solving, self- questioning, summarizing, drawing conclusions)
  • Discuss how, when, where and why the strategy is used. Give specific examples
  • Label, define, model and explain the strategies
  • Discuss how the strategy was applied
Even more practice for ELLs can include:
  • Identifying vocabulary words
  • Model think alouds
  • Demonstrate strategies to help clarify the text
  • Plan for self- assessment

Friday, July 5, 2013

Mixing Languages

In Bilingual Life and Reality, the myth presented is that language mixing in children is a due to laziness. However, this is not the case.  "It is important to view within- and between-language mechanisms (overgeneralizations, simplifications, interferences, and so on) as strategies employed by children in their effort to use their weaker language" (193). Some other possible reasons include such as interference, filling in language gaps in the weaker language, and language mode (monolingual mode vs. bilingual mode). This helps to have an understanding as to why children may mix languages. 

Thursday, June 27, 2013

Gestures, Meanings, and Culture

Gestures often cause miscommunication due to cultural differences among countries. This short video provides some insight into how these gestures that we are accustomed to can be taken the wrong way.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRQSRed58XM

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Cultural Misunderstandings

Here is a video that Dr. B shared with us this week. It shows some wonderful examples of cultural misunderstandings that occurred during a business meeting.

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Benefits of Bilingualism

I recently came across an article on BroadyESL on the benefits of bilingualism. I often wondered this before, however when I came across this it seemed to answer all of my questions. Some benefits include linguistic, cognitive, and linguistic benefits, individual benefits, as well as social benefits.

http://www.sc-languages-plus.info/2013/language-learning/the-benefits-of-bilingualism-06041163

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

School Policies and Practices

Below are school policies and practices that support high quality learning.
  • Schoolwide vision of high expectations for all students
  • Curriculum offered to all students is based on the same standards
  • All students are provided with equal opportunities to achieve at high levels
  • All studwents are provided with equitable learning resources and high quality instruction
  • Instructional time is organizer to enhance learning for all students
  • There is ongoing professional development for teachers to support high quality learning for ELL students
  • Schools support appropriate use of accomodations
  • Schoolwide understanding of purpose and use of a variety of assessments
  • Assessments are fair for all students. Guidelines are in place to avoid cultural bais
  • Ass assessments are used to improve student learning


Lachat, Mary Ann (2004). Standards-Based Instruction and Assessment for English Language Learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Effective Learning Environments


Effective learning environments for ELLs have several important practices:

- A comprehensive, school wide vision for developing a high quality education for ELLs

- A school wide approach used to restructure learning environments

- Effective language development strategies implemented

- High quality learning environments involve curricular strategies that engage students in meaningful, in-depth learning

- Innovative instructional strategies are implemented



Lachat, Mary Ann (2004). Standards-Based Instruction and Assessment for English  Language Learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Assessment of English Language Learners

Colrin Colorado put together a video on assessing English Language Learners. The three top challenges for teaching and assessing ELLs include language, culture and prior academic experiences. In this video, Dr. Lorraine Valdez Pierce discusses the importance of classroom strategies for assessment.

http://www.colorincolorado.org/webcasts/assessment/

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Effective Assessment

I recently came across the link below that discusses the importance of effectively assessing ELL students. This link shows wonderful examples that allow for ELLs to show what they are capable of doing. 
http://www.cal.org/resources/digest/tannen01.html

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Games as a Formative Assessment

Dr. Broady posted an article that describes different forms of assessments that can be used in the classroom. I personally really enjoyed this article- it is one that is definitely worth sharing with the teachers you work with! This article provides a variety of assessment strategies that still provide measurable feedback. Standardized testing does provide feedback, however it does not cover multiple forms of intelligence. The assessments found are very engaging for all ages of students and are helpful at measuring your students' academic progress.

http://broadyesl.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/games-as-formative-assessments/

Friday, May 17, 2013

Standards Implementation Issues for ELL's


Most studies on school reform have not included ELL’s. Issues include developing academic and English proficiency, addressing the varied needs of ELL’s, or implications of emerging assessments. “The notion of ‘one size fits all’ will not work, and that even the most promising approaches to instruction and assessment cannot be offered uniformly to all populations” (46). There is also concern with the use of standards with students who have not developed full English proficiency. Standards implementation is based on if the teachers have the resources and know how to implement these standards. This does not take into account that some students aren’t ready to perform near proficiency level. Two challenges that need to be taken into account for ELL’s includes the wide diversity in language/literacy/skills, and the wide knowledge gaps in the education field. Schools are deficient to making sure ELLS are performing at high levels. To be completely honest, my school last year functioned this way. There was no accountability of ELL students performing at higher levels. This year, however, we have a new district coordinator and she has made sure to educate teachers and help move students forward. Standards- setting has given little consideration to how diverse students are. Applying standards fairly to diverse students requires attention be taken on to how these standards can be connected to instruction. This will help students with a variety of English proficiency levels to develop higher- level skills.




Lachat, Mary Ann (2004). Standards-Based Instruction and Assessment for English
           Language Learners.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Literacy Strategies for ELL's

Literacy can be hard for any student, let alone an English Language Learner. Erin White, of Purdue University Calumet, has created a slide show presentation that discusses the 8 areas of literacy strategies. It has wonderful ideas!

http://literacy.purduecal.edu/STUDENT/ewhite00/adobepresenter/index.htm

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Challenges

English language learners face many challenges. The biggest challenges ELL students face include:
  • Instructional needs being met due to cultural and linguistic diversity. Even though all students share the need to build proficiency, “they differ from each other in their country of origin, language and cultural backgrounds, socioeconomic status, family histories, length of time in the United States, mobility, level of education prior to immigrating to the United States, level of parent education, and educational goals” (22).
  • Living in high- poverty areas can include inadequate employment opportunities, health and social services, as well as crime. These schools sometimes tend to emphasize on basic teaching skills instead of higher- order thinking, and have limited technology.
  • Need to work towards English proficiency for both social and academic purposes. Teachers need to focus on connecting to prior knowledge, and if teachers don’t have an understanding of their students’ backgrounds, it can make it a challenge for ELL’s to understand the content.
There are many challenges ELL students face in the classroom. I believe a part of the challenges these students face is a teacher’s lack of awareness for these students’ needs.

Monday, May 6, 2013

Reading Assessments

 In this video, Dr. Lundgren discusses the importance of using valid and reliable assessments for your students. Often teachers find themselves using basals, modeling, and examples that aren't necessarily useful for diverse populations.

Strategies

Listed below, you will find strategies to promote student understand of classroom communication:
- Restate complex sentences as a sequence of simple sentences
- Avoid or explain the use of idiomatic expressions
- Restate information as a slower pace
- Pause often to allow students to process what they hear
- Provide explanations of key words and special technical vocabulary
- Bring in objects, photographs, or other materials to explain content
- Use visual organizers and graphics to organize and illustrate key points
- Provide an outline of a lesson that students can review
- Allow time for students to discuss what they have learned and to generate questions about areas that need more clarification.



(Zehler,1994).

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Traditional Testing Culture vs. Today's Assessment Culture

Traditional Testing Culture
Traditional Testing Culture allows for students to be ranked according to their mental capacities. It allowed for sorting and tracking of students, and schools weren't being held accountable for learning and academic success for all students. Traditional testing discriminated between high and low scores, so that scores could be easily discriminated to compare students. It believes that intelligence and learning capacity were fixed traits that could be predicted. Therefore, the test was to rank students for the purposes of comparison and rank. In this, schools were not held accountable for the learning and academic success for every student. The quality of education was undermined by testing policies. These students were denied the opportinuty to develop the capacities needed to succeed. The testing culture also didn't stress complex and rich ways of demonstrating learning. It only focused on a narrow range of cognitive abilities. The students who scored low were mostly poor students, or ESL. These rankings put these students in low- level classes.

Today's Assessment Culture
The assessment culture focuses on high standards and education for all students. It deemphasizes ranking students against test norms, and emphasizes on improving student academic success. This should have been the main focus all along. The assessment culture uses tests as a tool, and determines whether all students are hearning at higher levels. This year, our district has put a major emphasis on higher order thinking- and not just for the "brightest" students. It shows an understanding of how students learn, and that intelligence is multifacted and not just a fixed trait. Student proficiency cannot accurately be ranked according to a single dimension.
 
 
The Testing Culture
The Assessment Culture
- Unitary, fixed trait
- Multifaceted, developmental
- Based on a measurement model that treats abilities as relative positions on a normal curve
- Based on a standards model where achievement is criterion- referenced
- Emphasizes accuracy, speed, and easily quantifiable skills
- Focuses on student performance, not just content domain
- Testing and instruction are separate activities
- Regards assessment as central to instruction
- Determines how students rank and compare to others
- Determines how students perform relative to standards of excellence
- Focuses on a narrow range of cognitive abilities
- Emphasizes complex ways of demonstrating learning
- Uses test results to sort students into classes and courses
- Uses assessment results to improve teaching and learning


In my opinion, the difference makes a huge difference to ESL students. It is not fair to compare students based on an assessment, especially when ESL students can have different language barriers they are facing. Our school recently did away with MAP testing, and I am honestly a little relieved. It isn't fair to put all students in front of an assessment and rank them, when there are many different factors. Today's assessment culture shows how students' academic performance is relative to the content, not in relation to others. It is more important to see that the students understand the content taught. I personally believe that assessment needs to drive instruction. We need to use assessments to move our students forward and focus on their academic success.
 

.


Home Language Surveys

As a teacher, you always send out home language surveys at the beginning of the school year. To be completely honest, I was never sure what was actually done with the results from that after I sent them to the office. This past week, I finally understood what school districts do with the results from these surveys. In Montgomery County, if the student's home language survey indicates a home language other than English, students are given the w-apt screening (wide screening for placement into ELD program). If the student passes the w-apt and is in kindergarten, the student must remain in the program untill passing the access in January. If the student is in any other grade and pass, they are marked ifep (initially fully English proficient) in infinite campus.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Formative Assessment and Standards- Based Grading: Robert Marzano

This video segment discusses the comprehensive approach. In this approach, you need to broaden the scope of what an assessment really is. There are three different types of assessments.
1. Obtrusive: demonstrations, projects, discussion
2. Unobtrusive: when the student is being assessed
3. Student Generated: shows students' levels

Based on classroom observations and assessments, give what you are used as data. How can you use that as a grade? Some students do understand content and can be evident in classroom observations and discussions. It often can be hidden on assessments due to different factors, such as language barriers, test anxiety, etc. There are many ways to measure the student's proficiency.
 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfOnyrWtPu0

Standards- Based Grading: Rick Wormeli


 
Our professor had us watch this short video this week as an assignment. I found this video very interestingand had to share it! I use some of the theories in my own grading.  A 65% shows that student does not understand a concept, and I do not want my students to feel defeated. In first grade, they are still trying to figure out what school is about. Our school is going to standards- based grading next year, so it gives me an outlook on what needs to be done. Giving a zero on a 100 point scale is a very controversial issue. I really appreciate it when Mr. Wormeli says that this scale was never meant to be used as a way to measure human progress against a goal- it has been corrupted. Teachers need to consider that a grade scale for a letter grade doesn’t matter. A zero is the most un-recoverable grade. When grading, do you grade by giving an “f”, or an un-recoverable “f”? Failing a student shows the student has not mastered the content. Even if a child gets a zero, it can take many 100% to bring the student’s average up. It can be overwhelming to a student. Think about how this could affect an ESL student with all of the challenges they are faced with. When grading, you need to pick the most hopeful approach to show that a child has not mastered the content. “An ‘f’ is an ‘f’”.

Sunday, March 17, 2013

RTI

Among my first grade team, we are departmentalized and ability grouped. As a result, my first block is all 10-20%. As a result, 90% of my class is in RTI (response to intervention). It discusses cultural considerations that need to be noted when working with response to intervention.

http://www.wce.wwu.edu/Depts/SPED/Forms/Kens%20Readings/RTI/RtI%20Cultural%20considerations%20with%20RtI%20Klinger%202006.pdf

Thursday, March 14, 2013

The SIOP Method

This post is a little lengthy- but definitely worth your time. Just like in teaching a mainstream classroom, there are many methods that can be used. After reading "Mastering ESL and Bilingual Methods", I have personally found the SIOP Method the most influential. To be honest- most teachers in my building do this anyways when making modifications for their students. Make sure to check out the video clip at the very bottom!

When designing effective learning for ELL students, I turn to the SIOP (Sheltered Instructional Observation Protocol) method. This method combines philosophies, strategies, and techniques that recognized challenges faced by ELL students. The SIOP method is hands on, relevant and interactive for students. Some indicators of this variation includes “language and content objectives; supplementary materials; connections between content and the prior knowledge and experiences of the students; vocabulary development; appropriate speech; learning strategies; interaction with teachers and other students; activities that require students to apply knowledge of content and language; and a cycle of review, feedback and assessment” (Herrera & Murry, 2011).

In the SIOP method, there are 3 critical aspects of the teaching process. The first aspect is in planning. There are many different factors that need to be taken into consideration when planning. As an educator, you need to drive instruction based on students’ needs and characteristics.  When planning, there are 5 steps a teacher can do to prepare. This includes integrating content and language objectives. Content objectives clarify what the student will learn from the lesson and are standard based. Language objectives focus on acquiring the academic language for ELL students. The second aspect is using the objectives to develop content concepts. As a teacher, you need to know the basic understandings on which the content is covered. The fourth indicator is supplementary materials. ELL students need to have the opportunity to use these materials. “This can include many hands on or visual materials. This helps practice and more fully understand key content concepts. Supplementary materials also give students the chance to practice new vocabulary and language structures” (Herrera & Murry, 2011). In the SIOP method, scaffolding on grade level is important. There needs to be an adaptation of the context. Finally in the planning aspect is providing ELL students with many opportunities with meaningful activities. “Teachers can make activities meaningful by considering the language proficiency. Then, teachers need to adapt their activities accordingly” (Herrera & Murry, 2011). When planning, you as an educator need to make the lesson relevant to the students.

The second aspect of the SIOP method is instruction. Teachers need to consider how to deliver instruction. Teachers need to take into consideration how it is going to help all students meet the language and content objectives. This includes building background knowledge, clarifying content concepts, students taking an active role by constructing their own meaning through opportunities to practice, interaction with others for academic purposes, and application (e.g., hands on activities, requiring students to apply knowledge of content and language).

The final aspect of the SIOP method is reviewing and assessing. Teachers need to review key vocabulary, review content concepts, continual feedback to students, application of new content concepts, and formative and summative assessments of the student’s progress. Teachers need to analyze the information they collected to review and revise lesson plans to guarantee students meet content and language objectives.
As noted in the lesson plan modification and assessments, all three critical aspects of the SIOP method were taken into account when planning and delivering the lesson plan.



In the link below, you will see the differences between instructional strategies and learning strategies in the SIOP model.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhYI3w5I0EA



Herrera, Socorro G., & Murry, Kevin G.  (2011). Mastering ESL and bilingual methods: differentiated instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.



WIDA Consortium. (2007). English Language Profociency Standards and Resource Guide. Board of Regent of the University of Wisconsin System.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Subject/Verb Agreement

As a first grade reading and language arts teacher, grammar is a HUGE component of our content. There are days in my mainstream classroom where I feel my students really struggle with subject/verb agreement. When I see some of my students struggling, I think about the language differences and how this can be a large challenge for ELL students.  I have read that ELL students (along with other students) benefit from hands on, relevant activities. So I went on a search for activities to help with this content area. I found this game that consists of throwing a ball to each other. There are a few variations listed on the site, but it was a great starting point to get ideas of other ways to incorporate engaging activities with grammar.


I also found this link on subject/verb agreement. Growing up, I always sat on the living room floor playing battle ship against my dad or sister. It was one of my favorite games. This online version has an academic twist than the version I grew up playing. This version incorporates subject/verb agreement.

http://www.quia.com/ba/144044.html?AP_rand=649876959

Monday, March 11, 2013

Kentucky Laws and Requirements

This website is a wonderful resource for any teacher! Colorin Colorado has provided a list of resources for Kentucky state laws. The website also provides flow charts of the activities that must occur for identifying, assessing, providing programming, and exiting students. This is very helpful. Sometimes as teachers we may get overload on required information- a flow chart helps put it in a format that is easier to read. If you don't live in Kentucky- thats okay, it contains other state laws and requirements too!

http://www.colorincolorado.org/web_resources/by_state/kentucky/

Saturday, March 9, 2013

Language Difficulties


Spanish differentiates from English because Spanish uses the Latin alphabet. Spanish students may make mistakes with the English vowels a,e,i. The consonants h,j,r,y may also cause trouble, since they have significantly different names in Spanish. The phonological system of Spanish is significantly different from that of English, particularly in the aspects of vowel sounds and sentence stress. This often makes English pronunciation harder on Spanish speakers. As a mainstream teacher, this isn't something I took into consideration before reading. The link below provides resources for teachers, administrators and parents of ELL students. It is especially useful for teachers because it also shows other challenges faced that teachers may not consider.http://esl.fis.edu/index.htm

Friday, March 8, 2013

Building Background Knowledge

Building background knowledge is necessary for CLD students. Understanding a student’s prior knowledge affects their ability to understand new information. “Instruction that helps CLD students connect new concepts to their prior life and learning experiences improves their language comprehension” (296). The SIOP method encourages teachers to consider 3 indicators. These include students’ life experiences, students’ prior learning experiences, and key vocabulary. This helps CLD students create a constructivist context for understanding new concepts. Putting an emphasis on vocabulary helps connect what they already know to new words in L2.
This link discusses the importance of building background knowledge.
ttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po0lKqVELPk

This link discusses explicit details for building background knowledge.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytXeEFCTMbg






Herrera, Socorro G., & Murry, Kevin G.  (2011). Mastering ESL and bilingual methods: differentiated instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Higher Order Thinking

Higher- Order thinking is based off of Bloom's taxonomy. Currently, it is our school-wide goal to incorporate higher- order thinking questions into our lessons. The connections students make and apply are outstanding when presenting them different questions. One area I stumbled with was incorporating higher- order thinking with ELL students. However, the benefits outweigh the challenges. On page 238, it states, "Incorporating opportunities for higher order thinking using the ICB method develops a wider range of discourse skills among CLD students than does traditional segregated skills language instruction."  That is when I came across a wonderful blog. On it, it discusses the importance and strategies of higher order thinking with ELL students. It is definitely worth a look!
http://esl-methods.wikispaces.com/Higher-order+Thinking

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Running Records

As a first grade reading teacher, I am constantly assessing my student's reading levels by running records. Running records allow for educators to find their students' independent and instructional reading levels- which forms guided reading groups. Running records also allow you to see where your students tend to make errors. These errors are either in meaning, structure, or visual. However, I never consciously thought about cultural and language barriers for ELL students until I read the article WIDA posted. It has helped put their miscues into perspective.

http://widaatwcer.blogspot.com/2013/03/running-records-and-ells-miscue-analysis.html

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Technology Resources

I have attached a pdf of a list of wonderful technology resources that can be used in the classroom. It not only has a list of these resources, but also includes the cost, uses wih mainstream teachers, interfacing with TESOL standards, relationship to common core, and collaboration value. I connected it to first grade common core standards since I am a first grade reading and writing teacher. However, this doesn't mean it won't connect to your grade!!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/syaajctzteofenp/technology1.pdf

Friday, March 1, 2013

History and Methods: The Grammar Approach

As a 1st grade reading/Language arts teacher, I found the history and methods of the grammatical approach to be very interesting. It was interesting to see the changes that were made over time. There were no connections to experiences or prior knowledge. It appeared to be grammar drills- which wasn't effective for CLD students. I found a link below that went into more detail regarding the 3 different approaches mentioned.
http://moramodules.com/ALMMethods.htm

Dominant Approaches to Second Language Instruction

In this week's reading we read about different approaches to CLD students. This included the grammatical approach, the communicative approach, and the cognitive approach. I found a link that was very useful in defining these approaches.

http://moramodules.com/ALMMethods.htm

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Readiness for CLD Families and Students

Time needs to be invested in employing strategies such as semi structured conversations with CLD students and families, which can bring unexpected, useful rewards. Teachers need to effectively maximize CLD student’s experiences to focus on instruction for cognitive and academic growth. This will reduce reteaching and increase the relevancy of instruction. Teachers who use these conversations increase their effectiveness as educators and their time available in the classroom. Time is further maximized at home visits. At home visits, the teacher learns about the student, the family, the community, and extended family members who are key stakeholders in the CLD student’s education. Questions that will be answered through these conversations include “what cultures are represented by students in the school and in the classroom?”, “what native languages do students bring to the learning community?”, and “How many students will need accommodation and at what levels?”

Here is a link to an article on accomoation readiness. I really liked how he discussed common misconceptions, but discussed family support as well.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.joci.ecu.edu%2Findex.php%2FJoCI%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F183%2F152&ei=o_gvUcTfK6aS0QHuooHACA&usg=AFQjCNHhHxd3GJuMSaiGiYrpGG3r5ClNgA&sig2=BdSl7dxoiIoXsRUaa33sgQ

Friday, February 22, 2013

Two Way Immersion

Two- Way Immersion has “become an increasingly popular way to attract public support for multilingualism” (123). In this program, not only are CLD students learning one language, but the native speakers are learning another language as well. Since this program is cross- cultural and is multilingual, CLD students tend to have higher achievement levels than in just L2 alone. This section also discussed how this program facilitates CLD students becoming more proficient in L2 if they have a strong foundation built in L1. It is critical that a lesson is never retaught in the other language, rather the content can be spiraled. There are many factors to the success of this program. Success stems from the following:
  • instruction that is grounded in the core academic curriculum
  • a minimum of 4-6 years of bilingual instruction
  • language arts instruction in both languages that target all 4 aspects of literacy development
  • instructional separation of the 2 languages
  • instruction in the non- English language for at least 50% of the time
  • Support and understanding of the program from administration
  • additive bilingual learning environment
  • high levels of parent involvement
  • highly qualified instructional personnel
This is the most effective model discussed in chapter 4. However, there are concerns. Some concerns into student involvement and retention, parental support, and due to inappropriate modifications for native speakers, CLD students “may be shortchanged in their L1 development” (125).
This video shows a school that implements a Two- Way Immersion program and its importance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-TMa8ZObl4
This second link is to a “Two Way Immersion Toolkit”. It address program design and planning, classroom instruction, and parental involvement



Herrera, Socorro G., & Murry, Kevin G.  (2011). Mastering ESL and bilingual methods: differentiated instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Authentic Literacy

Research on literacy development indicates that CLD students should be bathed in rich and authentic literacy activities from early stages of literacy development.  Do this by maximizing their own prior experiences, culture, background knowledge, and reasoning to actively contribute to instruction. You need to remember that begin school, CLD students have often been exposed to many activities that contributed to their literacy development.The first link posted goes into more detail about authentic literacy. It also provides some literacy activities that can be applied in the classroom. The second link posted is a link to a teacher handbook. It not only provides activities, but real models as well.

http://authenticliteracy.wordpress.com/
http://www.authenticliteracyinstruction.com/img/HandbookK3.pdf

Monday, February 18, 2013

Challenges of the Lingustic Dimension

This is a great video for mainstream teachers to watch. This video discusses challenges and second language acquisition. A definite must see!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_LOBBLmgYc

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Cognitive Development

Cognitive development is sometimes neglected in the classroom due to its complexity. CLD Students often face challenges in instruction. These challenges include interrupted cognitive development in L1, instruction that fails to target a variety of learning styles, In English vocabulary knowledge and comprehension are primary determinants of reading comprehension ability, core structures of some subject areas are extremely difficult for ELL students, and some content areas require a high level of declarative and precedural knowledge of integration.

As teachers, what can we do??
Teachers need to keep the following in mind:
  •  Self- Concept/ Self- Esteem: Create a safe environment by being friendly- make the student feel appreciated!!
  • Peer Acceptance and Socialization: Adolescents often have a strong desire to belong to a group for feelings of self- worth.
  • Physical Development: Teachers need to be aware that ELL students are experiencing not only the expected physical changes, but also the additional stresses related to cultural and linguistic differences.
  • Development of Abstract Reasoning:Teachers have an even greate responsibility to influence intellectual development by being caring, and nuturing role models.
Being aware of these, also facilitates in teaching modifications that are "cross- culturally sensitive, effective in reducing the need for reteaching, and designed to reduce the slope of the learning curve for all students" (36). We need to make sure students not only understand the concept, but are also able to transfer and apply the content to other situations. Our ELL students would be much more successful if we connected concepts so they are able to transfer the information. If we do this for other students, why shouldn't we be doing this for ELL's as well?


Herrera, Socorro G., & Murry, Kevin G.  (2011). Mastering ESL and bilingual methods:              differentiated instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

CLD Students: Asset or Liability?

I am currently reading the book, "Mastering ESL And Bilingual Methods." I am not the type of person who enjoys reading textbooks, however there is a lot of valuable information in this book. When reading, there was a section that really stuck with me. It was named "The CLD: Asset or Liability." It says "You might well ask, Why assets and liablities? The sad fact is some of our schools continue to perceive the CLD student as a liability- a student who is liable to fail because he or she cannot understand or speak the language of instruction" (7). This statement honestly bothers me. In schools there are many students who struggle to understand the content and instruction. But that's our job as teachers. It says "educators are responsible for educating all students" (10). It is our job- we need to find a way to deconstruct and help these students understand the content. No child should ever be seen as a liability. Schools need to see the assets these students bring. These assets include:
multilingualism, experiences and schooling in another country, and familiarity with multiple cultures and ethnicities. These assets should be used as an enhancement. The stereotype of ELL students being a liability because they don't understand the language needs to end. Teachers need to recognize there is more to it than language development. It also includes cognitive and academic development for CLD students to be successful.
 
Herrera, Socorro G., & Murry, Kevin G.  (2011). Mastering ESL and bilingual methods         differentiated instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Language Objectives

Language Objectives aren't as confusing as they first seem! Watch the small clip below to see how I created my language objectives.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbC5_IxoGm8

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

ELL + Silent Period

Silent Period with ESL
When deciding on a student, I had two options. One girl will not speak at school. The little boy I chose did not speak at school last year, which caused a low score, however is this year. This made me wonder if it was common for ELL students to have a silent period. Here’s what I found- and there is so much out there on the topic!
“According to Stephen Krashen, most new learners of English will go through a “silent period” which is an interval of time during which they are unable or unwilling to communicate orally in the new language. The silent period may last for a few days or a year depending on a variety of factors. It occurs before ELLs are ready to produce oral language and is generally referred to as the “Pre-production” stage of language learning. ELLs should not be forced to speak before they are ready and we don’t want to embarrass students by putting them on the spot.. What determines the length of the" silent period?" There are several factors involved. First, personality plays a key role. A normally shy and quiet youngster in native language is usually going to take longer before they feel comfortable speaking. Native culture will also play a role. In many cultures, for example, girls are not expected to speak out. They play a more passive role in family and classroom dynamics.
The Pre-production Stage of Language Learning
Your students are learning during this silent, pre-production stage. They are acquiring language every day.
  • They may have up to 500 words in their receptive vocabulary.
  • New learners of English can listen attentively and they may even be able to copy words from the board.
  • They will be able to respond to pictures and other visuals.
  • They can understand and duplicate gestures and movements to show comprehension.
  • Choral reading and Total Physical Response methods will work well with them.
  • English language learners at this stage will need much repetition of English.
  • They will benefit from a “buddy” who speaks their language.
  • Teachers should focus attention on listening comprehension activities and on building a receptive vocabulary.
(http://www.everythingesl.net/inservices/pre_producti_silent_period_93415.php)
I also found that students are able to comprehend what is being said. This is very true in the young girl at my school. She is able to nod or shake her head to questions, and she will do her work at school. However, it harder for ELLs to express their ideas. This shows that comprehension precedes actual production. “Nevertheless, with more exposure on those topics, and if they became meaningful to me and part of my everyday reality, after a while I would be able to start to use that specific jargon as part of my everyday vocabulary. In this example, the stretch of time between my initial exposures to the topic, maybe the first time I heard a report on those topics and the time when I could talk about it freely without jargon or any language-related problems could be considered my silent period in the field.”
http://www.eslbase.com/articles/acquisition

WIDA Can Do Descriptors

WIDA Can Do Descriptors are very helpful when creating language objectives. The WIDA Can Do Descriptors show where and what an ELL student is capable of doing. For example, if a student is on a level 1, Entering, the student may point to pictures or answers. These Can Do Descriptors show where a student is, and where and what is needed to push them to the next level. These also help identify modifications a student may need. They include many domains, such as listening, speaking, reading, and writing. There are many practical applications that can be used with these Can Do Descriptors. For example, you can identify the student's level and incorporate it into your lesson plans when differentiating and making modifications.

 

Friday, January 18, 2013

Legal Responsibilities

Under civil rights law, schools are obligated to ensure that English learners (ELs) have equal access to education. However, the Office of Civil Rights does not explicitly require a school corporation to use a specific intervention or program in order to serve their LEP students. However, the OCR has outlined the following procedures that school corporations should follow in order to ensure that their programs are serving LEP students:
- Identify students who need assistance;
- Develop a program which, in the view of experts in the field, has a reasonable chance for success;
- Ensure that necessary staff, curricular materials, and facilities are in place and used properly;
- Develop appropriate evaluation standards, including program exit criteria, for measuring the progress of students; and
- Access the success of the program and modify it where needed
(Source: “The Provision of Equal Education Opportunity to Limited- English Proficient Students”, August 2000)

English Language Proficiency Testing
Published: 12/18/2012 1:43 PM

To meet No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Title III requirements, states are mandated to identify and annually administer a standards-based English language proficiency test to all English Language Learners (ELLs) in grades K-12.Main Content In order to comply with the NCLB requirement of an annual English Language Proficiency Assessment for ELLs, Kentucky joined the World-class Instructional Design and Assessment (WIDA) Consortium in 2006. The WIDA Consortium’s goal is to provide research based assessments, standards and professional development to its member states. WIDA provides Kentucky with a placement test called the W-APT (WIDA ACCESS Placement Test) as well as the annual English Proficiency Assessment of ACCESS (Assessing Comprehension and Communication in English State-to-State) for ELLs.
ACCESS for ELLs
This is an English language assessment tied to the state’s language proficiency standards with varying stages of second language acquisition. It contains social and academic language contexts. For Title III accountability, ACCESS for ELLs measures annual gains in English language proficiency-Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs).

Alternate ACCESS for ELLS®
Alternate ACCESS for ELLs® is an individually administered paper and pencil test. It is available in four grade level clusters: Grades 1-2, 3-5, 6-8, and 9-12. There is not a Kindergarten form. The test allows students to demonstrate their English language proficiency in all four language domains (listening, speaking, reading, and writing) and in four of the five ELP standards (social and instructional language, and the language of language arts, mathematics and science).
Alternate ACCESS for ELLs® is designed for ELLs with significant cognitive disabilities. A student with significant cognitive disabilities is identified as having one or more of the existing categories of disabilities under IDEA (e.g., intellectual disabilities, autism, traumatic brain injury, multiple disabilities, etc); and their cognitive impairments may prevent them from attaining grade level achievement standards, even with the best instruction. (adapted from U.S. Department of Education: Alternate Achievement Standards of Students with the Most Significant Cognitive Disabilities Non Regulatory Guidance, August 2005).
In order to receive meaningful information from the test, it is very important that only students who meet all 3 criteria below participate in the assessment. Other ELs should continue to take the existing ACCESS for ELLs® assessment, with appropriate accommodations as necessary. Participation has to be decided by the student's IEP team.
Participation Criteria:
  • The student has been classified as EL.
  • The student has a significant cognitive disability and is eligible for special education services under IDEA.
  • The student is in an alternate curriculum aligned with their state's academic standards and is participating in the state's alternate accountability assessment
WIDA ACCESS Placement Test (W-APT)
W-APT is the screener that is based upon the ACCESS for ELLs. Its purposes are for the following:
1. To identify students who may be candidates for English as a Second Language (ESL) and/or bilingual services.
2. To determine the academic English language proficiency levels of students new to a school or to the U.S school system in order to determine appropriate levels and amount of instructional services.
3. To accurately assign students identified as ELLs to one of the tiers for ACCESS for ELLs.
The W-APT test forms and administration manuals are located on the WIDA website. Districts must enter their W-APT username and password to view and print the files.
The W-APT calculator is a tool that calculates speaking, reading, listening and writing proficiency scores along with composite proficiency levels (CPL) scores and grade-adjusted CPL scores.

(Taken from:http://education.ky.gov/AA/distsupp/Pages/EL-Testing.aspx)