Traditional Testing Culture
Traditional Testing Culture allows for students to be ranked according to their mental capacities. It allowed for sorting and tracking of students, and schools weren't being held accountable for learning and academic success for
all students. Traditional testing discriminated between high and low scores, so that scores could be easily discriminated to compare students. It believes that intelligence and learning capacity were fixed traits that could be predicted. Therefore, the test was to rank students for the purposes of comparison and rank. In this, schools were not held accountable for the learning and academic success for every student. The quality of education was undermined by testing policies. These students were denied the opportinuty to develop the capacities needed to succeed. The testing culture also didn't stress complex and rich ways of demonstrating learning. It only focused on a narrow range of cognitive abilities. The students who scored low were mostly poor students, or ESL. These rankings put these students in low- level classes.
Today's Assessment Culture
The assessment culture focuses on high standards and education for all students. It deemphasizes ranking students against test norms, and emphasizes on improving student academic success. This should have been the main focus all along. The assessment culture uses tests as a tool, and determines whether all students are hearning at higher levels. This year, our district has put a major emphasis on higher order thinking- and not just for the "brightest" students. It shows an understanding of how students learn, and that intelligence is multifacted and not just a fixed trait. Student proficiency cannot accurately be ranked according to a single dimension.
The
Testing Culture
|
The
Assessment Culture
|
-
Unitary, fixed trait
|
-
Multifaceted, developmental
|
-
Based on a measurement model that treats abilities as relative positions on a
normal curve
|
-
Based on a standards model where achievement is criterion- referenced
|
-
Emphasizes accuracy, speed, and easily quantifiable skills
|
-
Focuses on student performance, not just content domain
|
-
Testing and instruction are separate activities
|
-
Regards assessment as central to instruction
|
-
Determines how students rank and compare to others
|
-
Determines how students perform relative to standards of excellence
|
-
Focuses on a narrow range of cognitive abilities
|
-
Emphasizes complex ways of demonstrating learning
|
-
Uses test results to sort students into classes and courses
|
-
Uses assessment results to improve teaching and learning
|
In my opinion, the difference makes a huge difference to ESL students. It is not fair to compare students based on an assessment, especially when ESL students can have different language barriers they are facing. Our school recently did away with MAP testing, and I am honestly a little relieved. It isn't fair to put all students in front of an assessment and rank them, when there are many different factors. Today's assessment culture shows how students' academic performance is relative to the content, not in relation to others. It is more important to see that the students understand the content taught. I personally believe that assessment needs to drive instruction. We need to use assessments to move our students forward and focus on their academic success.